Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8AA6
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 01:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 164
2-Core 303
93% 178 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 861
81% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8AA6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 19.4
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 15
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GEJ9X113N 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51770C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 1099 848 1598 1347 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1322
Write 1,605
Mixed 1,074
SusWrite 1,036
284% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 21.8
111% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 50.6
91% 193 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 161%
Great: 304%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 14" 1280 720 AUO559C
Typical EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 640 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback