Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 74.5 2-Core 148 59% 99.3 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 433 42% 347 Pts	64-Core 539 33% 539 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.1% Good	Lighting 86.8 Reflection 89.2 Parallax 86.7 71% 87.6 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 80.8 Splatting 70.6 66% 81.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB 5,363 User benchmarks, average bench 237% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.7.F.V Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,558 Write 1,908 Mixed 1,616 380% 1,694 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 30.3 142% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 336 244% 320 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 383%
E25S512Z 512GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 218GB free Firmware: U0506A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4 147 365 28 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	Read 449 Write 410 Mixed 7.2 SusWrite 95.9 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.2 35% 8.53 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD416E82-4400G 2x16GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 2 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.2% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 139%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23.5"	1280 720	ACI24F3 ASUS VH242H

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM