Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 19:54
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 221
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 545
56% 449 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 545.92
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 62
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 57.6
50% 60.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$50
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 175 137 133 146 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 452
Write 365
Mixed 252
SusWrite 169
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 19.7
75% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 141
126% 199 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
78GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 60 57 68 67 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 48.3
Write 61.8
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 64.3
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
121% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 71%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 32 33 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 37.4
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 37.8
47% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
35% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x458A] CL16-18-18 D4-3000 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5B95 LG HDR QHD
Typical ProDesk 400 G3 MT Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback