HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B1D
Memory14.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100F-$87
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 49.5
1-Core 169
2-Core 294
88% 171 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 748
80% 636 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.7% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 77.7
69% 79.8 fps
MRender 85.1
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 65.6
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 1204 1157 1342 1287 1320 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 2,121
Write 1251
Mixed 1,422
SusWrite 1,208
335% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 37.9
145% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 262
250% 413 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 224%
Great: 413%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
803GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 122
Write 107
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 17.4
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A3 20TB
13.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 194 193 200 197 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 193
Mixed 147
SusWrite 191
247% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 1.5
413% 4.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 1.7
424% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
300GB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 39 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 57.3
Write 58.1
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 38.7
67% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 65%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 17 21 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.1 6 6 4.8 6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.2
Write 0.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.8
9% 8.93 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
30% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-8 KF556C40-8 HP52U40S6MA-8FRAE 24GB
4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 15 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2269 2269W
Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT15-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback