Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime7 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 02:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 335
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 938
96% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,156
72% 1,156 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$214
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 83.7
75% 88.6 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 73
70% 88.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAH20105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 100 213 162 100 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 508
Write 446
Mixed 396
SusWrite 166
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 31.4
142% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 95.3
121% 210 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 102%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
956GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 124 122 121 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 51
Write 65.6
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 122
113% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
65% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-8G3200RGB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 20.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 7 219 60 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical B550M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback