Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 46.1 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 104 39% 67.8 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 181 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(10F7 8338) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 5.7 4% 4.27 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 6.4 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G3AMNB-2200A 256GB 1,478 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10108L00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 236 246 262 297 278 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 372 Write 259 Mixed 228 SusWrite 262 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 18 62% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 209 168% 237 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FZG1-3 5CTSA62262 0032 FZG1-3 5CTSA62262 56GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 49152 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.7% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	43	60	10.1"	1296 759	MEI96A2 G1_FHD

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-5300UIntelBench 42%, 29,898 samples	17x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	17x

SSD
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	7x
HG6 mSATA 256GBToshibaBench 75%, 1,754 samples	2x
HFS256G3AMNB-2200A 256GBBench 64%, 1,478 samples	2x

RAM
FZG1-3 5CTSA61280 0032 FZG1-3 5CTSA61280 56GBUnknownBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
FZG1-3 5CTSA62262 0032 FZG1-3 5CTSA62262 56GBUnknownBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
FZG1-3 5LTSA21657 0032 FZG1-3 5LTSA21657 56GBUnknownBench 41%, 2 samples	1x