Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 12:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 81.4
41% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 87.8
8-Core 88.7
12% 88.2 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 21.8
13% 22 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 21.6
17% 21 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 480GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 27 21 26 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 69
Write 57.3
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 24
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 6.2
1,077% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 32%
Ccboot iSCSI 480GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 29 34 30 28 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 68.9
Write 55.6
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 30.5
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.8
1,047% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 16JTF51264AZ- 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.5" 1280 720 SAM0D46 S19F350
Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback