Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160827
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 155
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 221
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1A58 6752) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV512 512GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 245 214 225 215 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 840
Write 363
Mixed 368
SusWrite 227
99% 450 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 36.5
126% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 383
301% 423 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 173%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
214GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 17 28 26 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 186
Write 98
Mixed 16
SusWrite 34.2
90% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2
146% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 17
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 12.5" 1280 720 SHP142F LQ125T1JW02
Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 711 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback