Today's hottest deals

T-bao MN5X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemT-bao MN5X  (all builds)
MotherboardT-bao MN5X
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 336
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,107
109% 891 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 52.6
Parallax 70.3
35% 55.1 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 44
Splatting 25.9
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$96
517GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 449 463 478 413 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 417
Write 446
Mixed 379
SusWrite 455
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 50.3
180% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 274
224% 318 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PJ8TFK2GM8 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 43.8
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 31.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 126%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 24" 1280 720 PHLC0C5 PHL 246V5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback