Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 19:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 82.5
37% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 285
24% 210 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 122 120 118 123 123 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 145
Write 149
Mixed 113
SusWrite 122
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 6.9
24% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 128%
Adata Nobility N005 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$257
5GB free, PID 105b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 21 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 170
Write 21.9
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 20.3
56% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G1600L81 8502 PSD34G1600L81 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 16 64 0" 1280 720
Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback