Asus H110M-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-D  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 15:41
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 202
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 341
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R840E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 305 268 282 317 324 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 334
Mixed 262
SusWrite 299
223% 298 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 27.8
4,458% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 207
1,889% 204 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion 480GB
144GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 37 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 40.2
Mixed 35
SusWrite 38.5
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 6.8
1,161% 6.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.9% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 20 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07D0 SAMSUNG
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 2,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback