msi MS-168B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-168B
Motherboardmsi MS-168B  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 05:47
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P340-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 42.9
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 22.8
20% 26 Pts
4-Core 23
8-Core 23.3
3% 23.1 Pts
64-Core 24
2% 24 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSI(1462 106E) 256MB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.720.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.21% Terrible
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.62
Parallax 0.19
0% 0.36 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.07
Splatting 0.17
0% 0.24 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.21%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 43.3
Write 42.6
Mixed 37.5
31% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.67
4K Mixed 0.15
33% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSZ3128M8-EDJ1D SSY3128M8-EDJ1D 3GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.9
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-168B Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: msi MS-168B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback