Today's hottest deals

Philco 14I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 2%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPhilco 14I  (all builds)
MotherboardPHILCO 14I
Memory2.8 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Memory 15.5
1-Core 9.2
2-Core 13.1
9% 12.6 Pts
4-Core 14.6
8-Core 15.6
2% 15.1 Pts
64-Core 13.4
1% 13.4 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Device(1297 2028) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 91 92 86 77 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 53.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 82.3
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A1_ 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.45% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 1.5
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 2.1
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 28 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE05B1
Typical 14I Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Philco 14I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback