To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 01:42
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 173
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 626
58% 486 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 81.2
51% 67.3 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 44.4
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S371TB 1TB
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK70E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 223 319 356 359 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 388
Write 127
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 269
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 30.2
100% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 63.9
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 113
95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B5170GB0- M393B5170GB0- M393B1K70QB0- 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 29.1
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 GSM5A25 22MP55
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback