Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro 9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 9  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 9
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 11:38
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1255U
, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 53.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 315
92% 179 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 925
88% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Microsoft(1414 0063) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.3118
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 25.3
18% 24.6 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 19.6
19% 24.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GD3GX013N-SKhynix 255GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41001C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,530
Write 1073
Mixed 791
250% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 40
153% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 543
375% 475 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 47.5
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 22.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 125%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 131 17 60 13" 1440 960 LGD0719
Typical Surface Pro 9 Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback