Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIPASON
MotherboardIPASON B450MH
Memory3.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 00:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 298
85% 165 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 877
85% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,066
66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 25.8
15% 21.1 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 18.9
15% 18 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFKNU512GZ 512GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 449 80 76 81 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 1,411
Write 548
Mixed 134
SusWrite 138
121% 558 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 31.6
136% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 112
114% 197 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 29.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 75 21.5" 1280 720 ACR06AB SB220Q
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback