Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230107
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 11:34
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 33
1-Core 58
2-Core 90.8
34% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 134
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 4.4
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac G535N-KS 256G 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 204 104 52 67 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
Read 345
Write 294
Mixed 295
SusWrite 118
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 17.7
65% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 188
142% 189 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 4 60 13" 1280 720 BOE0892
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback