Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3300 Series MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3300 Series MT  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 21:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 176
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 298
35% 273 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
HP(103C 6889) 1.5GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 32.6
19% 26.9 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 31
Splatting 24.1
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 49 50 41 50 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.7% Poor
Read 132
Write 79.7
Mixed 16
SusWrite 48.4
15% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 19.4
30% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 LEN1144 LEN LT2452pwC
Typical Pro 3300 Series MT Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3300 Series MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback