Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$359
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 213
2-Core 421
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,529
141% 1,178 Pts
64-Core 2,811
174% 2,811 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
MSI(1462 5091) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
236% Outstanding
Lighting 354
Reflection 310
Parallax 389
288% 351 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 306
Splatting 202
232% 296 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 236%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,621
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,779
454% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 89.3
300% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,134
837% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
38GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,572
Write 2,507
Mixed 1,925
520% 2,335 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 87.6
306% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,196
DQ Write 1,006
DQ Mixed 1,195
870% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5600J2834F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 47.1
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 51.8
SC Write 55.6
SC Mixed 51.3
151% 52.9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 140%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 5R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 34% 53 360 60 144 31.5" 2560 1440 MSI1462 MSI MAG321CQR
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback