Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 03:23
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$133
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 331
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 947
97% 782 Pts
64-Core 1065
66% 1065 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 89.4
Reflection 89
Parallax 83.4
73% 87.3 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 78
Splatting 71.1
69% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1006A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 188 178 124 198 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1865
Write 1,502
Mixed 1177
SusWrite 316
270% 1215 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 36.3
197% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 517
475% 720 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 188%
Great: 270%
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
261GB free
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1680 999 893 870 844 825 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,624
Write 2,530
Mixed 1,749
SusWrite 1,019
443% 1,980 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 95.9
319% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,385
DQ Write 1,201
DQ Mixed 1,231
940% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 324%
Great: 433%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 207 221 217 214 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 438
Mixed 370
SusWrite 244
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 45.8
159% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 198
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 179 177 174 185 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Adata DDR4 3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Adata DDR4 3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 29.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 29.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback