Panasonic FZG1-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic FZG1-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG1-3
Memory3.3 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 04:14
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 24.1
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 113
37% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 138
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.3
3% 3.3 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 mSATA 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUPA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 188 189 247 270 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 336
Write 309
Mixed 329
SusWrite 235
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 16.8
50% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 225
170% 229 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FZG1-3 5LTSA21657 0032 FZG1-3 5LTSA21657 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 292
14% 292 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FZG1-3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG1-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback