Intel HM570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel HM570  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 16:22
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 284
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 892
87% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.8% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 73.6
64% 77.7 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 69
Splatting 63.7
62% 78.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 659 768 641 654 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1409
Write 1,197
Mixed 1,116
SusWrite 666
246% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 32
172% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 503
459% 693 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 183%
Great: 244%
Toshiba DT02ABA400 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 165 183 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 175
Write 177
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 169
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.6
7% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
219GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 75 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 86
Write 87
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 76.2
108% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT02ABA400 4TB
262GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 68 70 73 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
Read 182
Write 174
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 70
166% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 1.03 MB/s
TOSHIBA DT02ABA400 4TB
192GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 62 61 57 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
Read 175
Write 152
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 59.5
137% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
174% 2.03 MB/s
TOSHIBA DT02ABA400 4TB
261GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 68 70 73 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
Read 183
Write 183
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 70.1
166% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.6
264% 3.07 MB/s
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
0GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.9
Write 48.7
Mixed 26.2
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
JUHOR JHD3200U1816JG 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM570 Builds (Compare 869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel HM570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback