Asrock X570 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory44.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 01:57
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 182
2-Core 364
114% 213 Pts
4-Core 724
8-Core 1,244
119% 984 Pts
64-Core 1,671
103% 1,671 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2409) ≥ 4GB; Red Devil
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 134
Parallax 283
110% 184 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 144
Splatting 198
161% 198 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$154
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 415 422 432 431 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 420
Mixed 384
SusWrite 421
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 55.4
183% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 154
131% 192 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
903GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 127 129 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 141
Write 148
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 128
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZKY F4-3200C16-8GTZKY 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Pro4 Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback