Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST E5-MR9A PRO
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 767
70% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 56.5
Reflection 58
Parallax 52.6
46% 55.7 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 46.6
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SA2000M8/500G 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0523B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 1360 1415 1436 1435 1421 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
211% Outstanding
Read 1,679
Write 1,443
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 1,400
316% 1,407 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 25
127% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 472
353% 471 MB/s
Kingston SA400S37/960GB 960GB
621GB free
Firmware: 6315
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 377 378 370 371 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 336
Write 374
Mixed 340
SusWrite 372
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 225
175% 239 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 35.1
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback