Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 06:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 154
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 585
52% 441 Pts
64-Core 1,151
71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 64.5
30% 52.6 fps
MRender 44.6
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 42.1
37% 46.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NV900-512 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0708A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1511 1524 1523 1541 1543 1534 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,800
Write 1542
Mixed 1,187
SusWrite 1,529
340% 1,515 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 28.9
141% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 482
362% 485 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 229%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 8G 4x8GB
4 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 18.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback