EXO Smart Pro Q5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEXO Smart Pro Q5  (all builds)
MotherboardEXO NJ51CU
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 00:52
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 169
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 294
31% 250 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8686) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GKH868-480GB 480GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0608A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 352 355 362 365 306 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.9% Excellent
Read 430
Write 356
Mixed 275
SusWrite 342
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 31.6
105% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 204
165% 230 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.9% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Smart Pro Q5 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: EXO Smart Pro Q5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback