Today's hottest deals

Standard Standard

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemStandard Standard  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Cooperlake)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 271
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 711
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1146) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 113
Parallax 105
89% 109 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 82.3
80% 100 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 18.5TB
279GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 432
Write 352
Mixed 349
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 20.1
82% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 97
89% 133 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 62%
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 589
Mixed 75.4
186% 256 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 0.2
1,360% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 0.5
286% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
482GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 112 111 93 128 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 33.2
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 18.3
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Standard Standard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback