Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardRayvision R20
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 130
50% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 409
40% 327 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$219
Device(107D 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.5% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 72.4
66% 76.2 fps
MRender 88.6
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 66.3
61% 75.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 18.5TB
18GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 34 25 33 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 365
Write 232
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 44.4
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 0.9
26% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.5
DQ Write 65.1
DQ Mixed 0.7
21% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 62%
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.2
Write 200
Mixed 72.5
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 0.2
600% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 76.9
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
172% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
341GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 98 104 105 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback