Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 11:59
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 44.8
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 117
41% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 193
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 98.5
62% 81.9 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 46
49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.1020.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 12.7
6% 9.03 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 98 124 147 132 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 179
Write 182
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 124
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3160212AS 160GB
120GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 66 57 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
Hitachi HTS541612J9AT00 120GB
71GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 31 29 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 53.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 29.9
39% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD44EN1P CL19-19-19 D4-2666 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback