Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime10 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 34.9
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 90.6
36% 62 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 105
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 86.2
5% 86.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 365 362 35 40 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 371
Write 385
Mixed 328
SusWrite 188
72% 318 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 23.5
100% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 139
120% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
431GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45% Average
Read 90.5
Write 95.2
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 66.1
53% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB
264GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 97 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 98.3
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 96.7
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ DDR4 2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 228
18% 228 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback