Today's hottest deals

HP 23-g010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 23-g010  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B08
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 18:38
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-3800 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 37
1-Core 13.6
2-Core 34.8
19% 28.5 Pts
4-Core 48.1
8-Core 52.5
7% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 46.3
3% 46.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8280
HP(103C 2B08) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.2
0% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 48 69 37 47 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 77
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 53.2
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-g010 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-g010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback