Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJan 19 '23 at 00:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 123
53% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 465
40% 341 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 72.8
42% 60.9 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 44
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GN1TB 1TB
533GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 371 332 396 402 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 75.8
Write 191
Mixed 89
SusWrite 342
40% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 15.6
68% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 41.4
50% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.6% Above average
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback