Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
Motherboard EZbook
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220624
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 17:55
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 32
2-Core 47
24% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 45.8
8-Core 52
6% 48.9 Pts
64-Core 48.9
3% 48.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Device(1E63 002E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220614a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 132 210 266 241 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 324
Write 304
Mixed 306
SusWrite 215
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 87.6
68% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB
4 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback