Today's hottest deals

Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 14:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU1 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 141
57% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 386
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.4% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 122
Parallax 100
77% 106 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 99 100 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 499
Write 570
Mixed 420
SusWrite 121
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 45.1
155% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 320
237% 315 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade 282DEW7CTQ0QH4-0V7 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.5% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 23.4
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback