Today's hottest deals

Aftershock PH4AQF1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAftershock PH4AQF1  (all builds)
MotherboardAFTERSHOCK PH4AQF1
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 186
2-Core 308
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 784
95% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,703
105% 1,703 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1173) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.2% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 55.2
46% 66.3 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 55.2
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0218G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 982 951 1141 1412 1448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,651
Write 1,634
Mixed 1,595
SusWrite 1,170
341% 1,512 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 36.9
195% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 449
383% 582 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 224%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 37.3
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 24.7
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PH4AQF1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Aftershock PH4AQF1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback