Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 44.4
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 127
44% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 189
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9
Parallax 11.6
7% 9.63 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 8.8
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S3SSDA256-ECS-1 256GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210324a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 334 338 348 355 314 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 329
Write 308
Mixed 280
SusWrite 336
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 24.5
82% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 225
164% 212 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-082.A00G 9905713-044.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.2
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback