Today's hottest deals

LG 14ZD980-GX76K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 14ZD980-GX76K  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 14Z980
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190130
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 10:14
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 134
47% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 358
35% 288 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1854 0300) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5.6
4% 5.57 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5
Splatting 8
6% 7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1794
Write 1,464
Mixed 1,186
329% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 43.5
144% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 384
279% 368 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
237GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 832 857 876 821 840 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 887
Mixed 861
SusWrite 832
203% 902 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 41.1
131% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 384
288% 390 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 151%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC MEM-DOWN 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14ZD980-GX76K Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: LG 14ZD980-GX76K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback