Today's hottest deals

Notebook N150SD/N155SD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 19 months ago.
SystemNotebook N150SD/N155SD  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N150SD/N155SD
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4980HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 86.1
43% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 230
22% 184 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0150) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 1.8
1% 6.9 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 3.5
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 48 42 73 70 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43% Average
Read 317
Write 160
Mixed 330
SusWrite 67.1
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 15.7
60% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 27.6
63% 129 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
691GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 95 99 97 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 85
Write 97.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 97.5
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N150SD/N155SD Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N150SD/N155SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback