Today's hottest deals

PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408  (all builds)
MotherboardPEAQ H110H4-EM2
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 14:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 89
2-Core 186
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 279
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 128
Parallax 119
90% 119 fps
MRender 93
Gravity 122
Splatting 108
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 47 131 66 67 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 377
Write 76.7
Mixed 155
SusWrite 91.6
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 7.2
70% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 69.9
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 14.3
46% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 80%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
758GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 100 91 117 174 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 173
Write 169
Mixed 101
SusWrite 133
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback