Today's hottest deals

PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408  (all builds)
MotherboardPEAQ H110H4-EM2
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 15:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 369
51% 376 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.2% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 72.6
34% 68.6 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 44.7
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 78 85 43 47 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 372
Write 264
Mixed 229
SusWrite 75.1
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 7.7
70% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 81.5
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 15.1
48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
846GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 184 184 185 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 177
Mixed 123
SusWrite 184
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.2
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PEAQ PDT P30S4-I5H2/C408

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback