Today's hottest deals

Acer ConceptD CC314-72G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer ConceptD CC314-72G  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Beatles_CMS
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210219
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 02:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 506
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 147B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 44
24% 34.7 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 42.1
36% 45 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00007 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7102Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1950 873 830 834 836 836 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2435
Write 1,962
Mixed 1,589
SusWrite 1,027
392% 1,753 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 68.6
214% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 568
425% 567 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 253%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 18.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 19.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CC314-72G Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ConceptD CC314-72G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback