Gigabyte GA-MZ92-FS0-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 287%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE R282-004-WE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZ92-FS0-00  (all builds)
Memory247.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
P0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 72.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,053
94% 796 Pts
64-Core 4,873
302% 4,873 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000
Nvidia(10DE 1459) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 516.25
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 293
Reflection 283
Parallax 307
238% 294 fps
MRender 325
Gravity 279
Splatting 190
209% 265 fps
Poor: 174%
This bench: 203%
Great: 218%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPF2KX076TZ 7.5TB
7TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JCV10100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2964 3149 3252 3313 3320 3557 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 738
Write 3,137
Mixed 1142
SusWrite 3,259
476% 2,069 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 55.9
226% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,087
822% 1,107 MB/s
Poor: 172%
This bench: 347%
Great: 398%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 16x16GB
16 of 32 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
208% Outstanding
MC Read 82.8
MC Write 70.1
MC Mixed 102
243% 85.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 37.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 208%
Great: 220%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback