Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 531
58% 458 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1909) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 7.7
3% 9.8 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BEKT-66F3T2 80GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 48 49 47 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 77
Write 75.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 48.6
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback