Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20354

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20354  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 09:33
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 126
59% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 185
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 5.47
3% 4.82 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 5.74
4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
564GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 75.7
Write 78.8
Mixed 79.1
59% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.21
61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905417-062.A00G RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback