Today's hottest deals

Asus 1015E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 1015E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015E
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 12:57
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Memory 18.3
1-Core 19
2-Core 47.2
16% 28.2 Pts
4-Core 38.2
8-Core 41.9
5% 40.1 Pts
64-Core 44.8
3% 44.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 115D) 773MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.37 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.7
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.29%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 103 70 91 94 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 286
Write 169
Mixed 177
SusWrite 92.6
134% 181 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 7.8
1,242% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 109%
Great: 160%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
0GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Read 7
Write 3.8
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 1
5% 4.38 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6K 1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 334
12% 334 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1015E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1015E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback