Today's hottest deals

Asus 1015E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus 1015E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015E
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 23
2-Core 45.8
35% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 36.5
5% 39.1 Pts
64-Core 34.7
2% 34.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 115D) 870MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 25 20 38 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 12.6
Write 32.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 37.6
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 50%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB
0GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.1
Write 9.7
Mixed 6.7
13% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.6
85% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6K 1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 3.2
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 1.3
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1015E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1015E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback