Positivo POS-EIB85CZ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-EIB85CZ  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIB85CZ
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150609
Uptime14.3 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 22:04
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 65.3
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 142
58% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 309
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Zotac(19DA 6199) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.2
4% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 77 57 31 44 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41% Average
Read 391
Write 320
Mixed 267
SusWrite 63.2
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 13.2
56% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 31.3
43% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
594GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 85 47 95 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 159
Write 135
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 91.1
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
125GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 100 100 90 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 29
SusWrite 98.6
64% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
135GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 112 112 106 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 51.3
Write 66.2
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 109
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-691.A00LF HMT41GU6MFR8C-H9 9905471-060.A00LF 99P5429-006.A00Ls 32GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EIB85CZ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIB85CZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback