Today's hottest deals

Asus M2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2V  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 09:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
SOCKET AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 46.3
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 62.7
32% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 68.6
8-Core 75.6
9% 72.1 Pts
64-Core 82.5
5% 82.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1950 Pro
AMD(1002 0B12) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L160P0 164GB-$55
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BAJ41G20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 28 30 34 30 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 27.7
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 36%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
22GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 44 49 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 43.5
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2V Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback