Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B250-FinTech
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180517
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 14:38
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 50
2-Core 142
55% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 392
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 20.7
17% 20 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH128HBHQ-000L1 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 373
Mixed 292
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 36
142% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 227
171% 230 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 118%
WD Elements 1TB
428GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 95.9
Write 104
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 87.1
117% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FADP 017A 78.B1GN3.4040B 859B CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 12GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.5% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250-FinTech-CF Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback