Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 20:06
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 118
46% 79 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 174
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 3288) 1GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 21.8
13% 18.6 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 16.1
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 88 86 78 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 88.4
Write 88.4
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 84.5
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT325U6EFR8C-PBHJ 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-HD+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback